Can I understand from you that what is that One Thing whose name is One Truth i.e. omnipresent One God? This question was put to Renuka Khandekar then, now Renuka Narayanan, when she wrote in Faith Line, Indian Express, Monday, 21.8.2000, that there is One Truth i.e. One God. Since the very beginning, not firmly caught, this question was, is, will of mankind to all the projecting philosophers of the universe until it is correctly answered. Now it is firmly caught by me. Renuka’s answer to this question was that some questions are loopy in Faith Line, Indian Express, Thursday, 21.9.2000. Questions are not loopy ones, but they nake our quaggy inertia of the very beginning and make our intellect inventive to enable us understand and see unborn omnipresent original One, if caught or understood, if He wills. Afterwards after sometime late, late, she may have thought or she was made thought by someone that the question put to her is the genuine one or the basic one. Her answer to this question was again in Faith Line, Indian Express, Monday, 29.1.2001 that breath is Brahman i.e. One God i.e. One Truth. But this is not correct answer to this question. The question is that what is that unborn omnipresent Thing whose name is Brahman i.e. One God i.e. One Truth? Breath in itself is a thing and a name i.e. air a thing inhaled and exhaled is prana, svasa is there whose name is breath. Upto here it is correct in itself.But breath is not Brahman. Brahman in itself is distinct from breath. Brahman in itself is a Thing and a Name i.e. unborn omnipresent Thing is there whose name is Brahman i.e. One God i.e. One Truth. So the question put still remains unanswered because the question is that what is that unborn omnipresent One Thing whose name is Brahman i.e. One God i.e One Truth? As, Since the very beginning uptil now, all the projecting philosophers of the universe being in the ultimate state of their processes and powerful therefrom to do anything are unable to answer this question correctly. If Renuka also remains unable to answer this question due to lack of inventive brilliance or due to orthodoxy of her own, request was made to her to visit or invite to finalize this question to awaken the universe from the deep sleep of quaggy inertia of the very beginning. But as, since the very beginning uptil now, human nature is to ignore the requests and questions of the mankind