due to lack of inventive brilliance or due to orthodoxy of one’s own, the request is being ignored uptil now by her. The same state is of G. Gispert Sauch S.J. and others whom I wrote. That is to say that this question of mankind firmly caught by me, not firmly caught by the mankind was, is, will to the entire universe until it is answered correctly by Him through someone or directly.

As, Renuka misunderstood this question saying loopy in the first instance. Afterwards after sometime late, late she came to understand that the question put to her is the genuine one or the basic one and tried to answer though wrong. The same state can be of you in the first instance i.e. this original theory of a thing and a name and of unborn Brahman or Soul or Bhagvan may seem to you loopy due to lack of inventive brilliance or due to orthodoxy of your own or one’s own. Beware of it. It needs inventive most brilliance, continuous cautious-most practice and time to understand and inculcate this original theory which we lack. That is to say that when you will stop word Brahman i.e. Soul i.e. Bhagvan i.e. three words and all those other words which have misuse ancient history of them with them to apply to all born and all deities by any process at the time of thinking, speaking and writing, only then this original theory will come to your understanding with its original result that it contains in itself which is not known to anyone in the universe since the very beginning uptil now except unborn omnipresent original One or whom He has made known by His own will directly or indirectly without any process of the missions of the universe.

G. Gispert Sauch S.J, those who understand God ineffable or ineffable mystery, they are in quaggy inertia of the very beginning uptil now. Unborn omnipresent original One is ineffable for those who have not seen Him. He who has seen Him by His own will, for him, unborn omnipresent original God is effable. Because whenever we see anything, we can explain that thing, eyes may be physical or divine.